In some organizations, strategic decision making is a “free-for-all,”
a jumbled and mysterious process whereby a leader tries to decide the strategic
priorities for the organization with the group. Often the decision process
involves voting, rock/paper/scissors, heated debates, and a hasty drive to make
decisions based on the most vocal participants in the group. Unfortunately,
these dynamics can lead to win/lose decisions that create water cooler
discussion and resistance. However, the most effective strategic decision-making
often comes from meetings in which consensus is seen as a
process as well as an outcome. Effective decision-making comes from planning
teams that understand that a consensus decision is one
that all team members can support. They realize that consensus decisions may not
be the decisions most preferred by all members. The assumption is that when
true consensus is reached through a process in which everyone has a voice, the
output usually leads to collective ownership, commitment, and
superior decisions.
When I facilitate decision making
sessions, I like to use the “70/100 rule” and “Five Finger” method. The 70/100
rule means that the team members are at least 70% comfortable with the
decision, but 100% committed to it. The Five Finger method allows participants
to provide a show of support for a decision by displaying one to five fingers…see
below.One finger means that you are opposed to the decision and will likely resist it;
Two fingers mean that you are opposed to the decision, but will not resist;
Three fingers mean that you are opposed, but will work for it;
Four fingers means that it is a good idea and you will work for it;
Five fingers means that it is a great idea and you would like to lead it!
The Five Finger method gives everyone a voice and it makes
their preference visible to all. In addition, it can create a broader problem
solving discussion to work towards true consensus. If you would like your
meetings to be a success, be sure to have a qualified
facilitator who fully understands the complexity of obtaining true consensus on
your change initiatives.
No comments:
Post a Comment